Condom campaign falls flat


Brands looking to raise the bar with social media marketing should heed lessons from Durex’s recent hoax campaign explosion.  


International consumer furore erupted last week in response to a social media hoax by condom manufacturer Durex. A press release, published on Twitter by Durex, launching a new aubergine-flavoured condom, got consumers into a lather after Durex later revealed the hoax was a misfired attempt to raise awareness of the need for sex-themed emojis.

It appears Durex has been lobbying US company Unicode, the California-based coding consortium that acts as a gatekeeper for permissible emojis, to introduce a condom-themed pictograph, and the aubergine or eggplant, with its elongated ovoid shaft, is the emoji of choice among younger generations when discussing coitus via digital devices.

Safe sex messages, funny fruits, and more double-entendres than a Bangkok night market. With all these ingredients there’s clearly a lot of fun to be had. So why did Durex’s social media campaign fall flat?


Trusting relationship?

When consumers invite brands into their Twitter feeds and curated content                        there is a trust lgjcmtjw_400x400-150x150expectation that comes with the territory. When that trust is broken it can be very difficult to get back. For a prophylactics manufacturer, there is obviously very high risk in testing the trust of the consumer through hoax marketing. Time will tell whether Durex’s consumers lose faith in the company’s product messages.

Frolicking must be fun! 

Brands looking to start conversations with their consumers in this way is not new. In 2009 Australia’s Cinderella Jacket Man campaign had us believing in love at first sight; in 2014 Hi-Tec Manufacturing had us walking on water with its Liquid Mountaineering campaign. There have been countless others.

Whether promising true love or impossible feats of physical prowess, the social hoax campaign must carry one essential ingredient to ensure success – it mustentertain. If you’re going to fool people into believing your campaign, once the ruse is revealed their disappointment cannot be greater than the fun they’ve had on the journey.

Is that a condom or a cardigan?

Did Durex over-think this campaign? The company’s stated ambition to play a role in the creation of sex-themed emojis is a positive, if somewhat self-serving, cause. It provides a terrific launching pad for community conversations about safe sexual practices. Why then did the company feel the need to trick consumers into the conversation?

A consumer competition – moderated for tasteful submissions – asking people to suggest useful emojis to help elicit coital conversations in digital space, is a no-brainer which could have led to numerous spin-off campaigns and messages.

Sex in any language?

According to the South China Morning Post, Durex’s campaign caused most outrage in vegan-rich India where the humble aubergine is a staple of numerous national dishes.

Cross-cultural communication creates obvious pitfalls for brands in any sector. For a condom manufacturer the stakes are higher. To avoid cultural faux pas, Durex should have thought more about the feelings of its diverse audience, and again, inviting consumers to provide their own suggestions to add to the emoji conversation would have short-circuited critical blowback.

Have you ever fallen for a social media hoax campaign? How did you feel after the ruse was lifted? Inspired to go and buy the product? Cheated or misled? None of the above?

Feel free to comment below in text or emoji.


Politics of fear? Yes, we can!

picture1-1024x688Apologies in advance for giving fear more air time with this post, but we at Horizon felt that trends in global politics during 2016 warrant closer analysis.

The politics of fear is not unfamiliar. Just ask the opponents of the Gillard government’s carbon tax. But it’s rare to see it play out in so many countries in the same year.

In 2016 fear has been at the centre of political strategies that have reshaped the world. From London to Brussels, Beijing to Manilla, Canberra to Washington – in this Year of The Monkey fear has been a potent weapon in public affairs.

Rodrigo Duterte successfully convinced “large numbers of his people that drug use constitutes such an emergency that the very existence of the nation is threatened, and that only his rule can save the Philippines. It’s the oldest autocratic trick in the book.”[i] Duterte’s campaign, aided by advertisements like THIS, successfully lured 38% of the popular vote in a five-candidate race.

Whilst the rhetoric used in the Brexit referendum was less frightening, the outcome, at least for proponents of free trading blocks, was not. By pulling on fears of cuts to the UK’s National Health System, the Vote Leave campaign successfully exploited deep national pride in the country’s universal health system despite there being no evidence continued EU membership would impact the NHS in any way.

After the reality of the Brexit vote sunk in, ‘leavers’ began to realise the NHS would be no better off under a leave scenario. Many now support remaining in the EU, despite that no longer being an option.

In the US Donald Trump veers violently towards the rhetoric of fear to drum up his base. Whether his campaign advertisements will succeed in luring additional voters remains to be seen. What they have done is help to shape the Clinton communications campaign which has also gone the fear path – albeit a ‘fear Trump’ path, ably abetted by analysis of her opponent’s shortcomings.

In Australia we are not immune. The Mediscare tactics of the ALP’s recent federal campaign nearly tipped the balance of power back to Labor and who could forget the two years of fear campaigning waged by the Abbott-led Liberal party in the lead-up to the 2013 federal election.

So, why is the exploitation of fear such a proven method of political communications? And can hope trump fear in 2016?

Justin Trudeaux clearly believes his presidency owes much to hope, elected on a platform similar to that of Barack Obama in 2008 who famously made hope the centrepiece of his presidential candidacy. In 2016 the ALP tried its own version with its ‘100 positive policies’ agenda designed to position the alternative government throughout the protracted 8-week campaign.

It’s a curious thing that analysis of hope versus fear in public discourse is affected by the very thing that makes fear such a proven commodity – the media.

If we apply Cultivation Theory to this conversation we can conclude that, as long as the mass media gravitates to human, environmental and economic calamity, the preponderance of messages espousing fear will continue to be de rigour in public discourse. The result of this is a public living in a heightened sense of ‘fear-readiness’, where the fear buttons are more easily exploited.

Short-circuiting this paradigm to have people think more logically gets harder the more afraid (or willing to be afraid) the public is. When a confluence of issues – i.e. economics, illegal immigrants, health, security, et al – come together you’ve got the right cocktail for exploiting fear.

Time will tell if the US will allow fear to trump hope this November.


What is Australia’s innovation identity?

There’s never been a better time to get excited about innovation in Australia. So the saying goes. The reality however, if you believe our progeny at Atlassian, might be a little less ecstatic. Solid inroads into the world of technology start-ups aside, Australia is a long way behind our international peers when it comes to technology and innovation (T&I).

We’ve only been hearing the innovation mantra since September last year (with apologies to Kim Beazley circa 2001), whereas the likes of Israel, Singapore and South Korea made T&I central to their economic futures as far back as the 1970’s.

With the NSW government’s recent announcement to transform part of Glebe Island into a technology hub it’s timely to examine the risks and opportunities investment into T&I presents to Australia form the communications perspective.

When we look at the global T&I leaders a common theme emerges. Each’s respective T&I capability grew (then diversified) after maximising their unique, specialist expertise – i.e. Israel (military T&I), Singapore (semiconductors), South Korea (robotics, biotech), et al.

Our rush to innovate might be missing a critical ingredient – our innovation identity.

Discussions about T&I in Australia are too often obscured by the one-in-a-billion success stories of unicorn start-ups like Atlassian. If our T&I hubs are to rival regional and global pacesetters we might pay to reflect on areas we already excel in, and invest in those industries whilst supporting ‘downstream’ innovations to emerge in their wake.

This is the same strategy that saw the emergence of multiple global financial hubs over the past 20 years. Rather than compete with London (Eurobonds, derivatives) or New York (public equity, debt capital), Singapore (again) set out to corner global interest in asset management and private banking. Chicago specialised in futures and options, Dubai in Islamic finance.

Putting our T&I eggs into one basket helps marketers and communicators sell ideas, opportunities and advancements as it enables the creation of a focused narrative. This is important for attracting and retaining top talent, local and international investment and giving the public something we can claim as our own in the way South Koreans take pride in their achievements in semiconductors and biotech.

So what might our innovation identity be?

The Federal Government thinks fintech could be a powerful economic driver and is putting our money where their mouth is – albeit at very small seeding levels to begin with. The global strategic partnership that includes Australian banks to accelerate the use of Blockchain technology, is also an interesting step.

Building on our world-leading capabilities in hearing aid technology which began in 1981 when the Federal Government funded the development of Cochlear, would be another practical step that follows this strategy. Green-tech and agri-tech are also seem obvious fits for Australia given our natural and agricultural resources.


First published in  

catriona rowntree talks travel & tourism marketing

What are some of the biggest changes you have seen in the tourism industry?

Considering I first started on Getaway 20 years ago, the extraordinary change for me revolves around communication. I started when people were literally just getting mobile phones, and now they rule our lives and in turn we are heavily influenced by social media and instant information which can be an incredibly powerful tool. The authenticity and the value of a brand is of utmost importance now. Whilst I think it is interesting with hotels there will always be fads, what’s cool, what’s in what’s out, etc. There is so much more for the guest now, hotels have to be 110% on their toes because if they are not, they are shamed instantly and on a mass scale with social media.

In your experience what have been the most effective marketing campaigns or tools used in destination marketing?

Two things come to mind. Firstly, you can’t beat the power of a beautiful image or beautiful advertisement when it comes to travelling. That is what our hearts desire, whether it is that classic image of that heart shaped reef from the Whitsundays or the Sydney City skyline on a perfect day, we must visually connect. Secondly, great service trumps everything else. People vote with their feet, if the service is fantastic, that will keep guests coming back again and again. Bad service equals the worst ad campaign on the planet.

Something I have learned is you can have all the bells and whistles in the world in your hotel, but if you don’t nail the service element then all of that means nothing. What I adore about that is that the human element can be the most powerful tool when it comes to travelling. You can have a hotel that has spent millions of dollars on marketing, but often the reason why we return to locations or hear wonderful things about them is actually based on individuals – the service element, and that is something we can actually control.

In terms of marketing states/destinations the most important thing is to celebrate your differences, never ever compare, never look over your shoulder and don’t ever think that the grass is greener on the other side. Embrace what is unique and remarkable about your particular location/destination, honour your past, and respect your heritage by protecting what you have. By protecting what we have naturally whether it is an environmental or historical element – by protecting that, there can be untold benefits to your business or even your whole community. For example if you drive through the town of Forbes in country NSW or Beechworth in Victoria someone, somewhere in a position of power has maintained the street front there, giving the town a completely unique identity, energy and indeed long reaching benefits for tourism. Honour your past and you will reap many benefits in your future.

What do Australian domestic destinations have over international destinations?

Service. It often gets back to the Australian personality, but our high level of service, low levels of crime, relatively good climate, there are so many tiny elements in Australia that locals take for granted that are highly valued by overseas travellers – safety, stable government, great service, easy going nature of locals, beautiful natural environments. As a young nation what we have to offer naturally is magnificent – you just don’t get a Great Barrier Reef, or a Tarkine Rainforest anywhere else in the world. What we have naturally is unbeatable, coupled with the lightness in our personality, it’s an unbeatable combination.

In recent years international tourism has increased but domestic tourism has decreased. What do domestic destinations need to do to market their assets?

Consider the cost. It is often cheaper to travel abroad than within our own country. I know that is challenging but, just being honest, price has so much to do with it. Getting back to facilities, kids clubs are so important for families. 

Ease of access is also important. State government have to help regional areas that have these amazing offerings but no proper transport to help travellers get there. You can have the most beautiful destination in the world but if a traveller can’t get there easily they simply won’t go. That has got to get back to state governments. There are some state governments that need to wake up and start thinking outside of their metro areas and be unified. Governments must help everyone out.

When you go to Victoria for a conference it is not just about what is happening in the city. Regardless of where the conference facilities are there are countless world class destinations beyond the metro area. It is important to help regional people out, to have a unified marketing campaign, get their social media live and right, and keep it up to date. Look at Google – what are the first things that come up? We need to put our regional centres right up there!

Campaigns must be independent as well. Sometimes the most powerful sponsor can have the most sway when it comes to marketing, which is completely unfair on so many levels. Marketing must be independent. We want more travellers to come to our locations. Why is France so popular when around the world it is renowned for such bad service? Because it has a brilliant transport system and a unified marketing campaign and that gets back to government. They have the final say, governments need to be more helpful in moving travellers around their states and having a unified website, and remaining independent.

In terms of Australian domestic travel, what are you most passionate about?

I am passionate about regional tourism. I feel the need to be loud and proud with regards to that because so often the metros dominate. But the fact is that a travellers’ ultimate experience comes down to the people they meet along the way. Arguably some of those finest experiences will be with those true Aussies that you meet in regional locations, whether it’s in a country town or in one of our magnificent parks. Money can’t buy great service, money can’t buy those wonderful local experiences. Knowledge is power and people need to be educated and learn about these things. 

First published on 

$20 bln Education Services Sector About to be Testsed

photodune-5908922-education-lAustralia’s education services sector is now a $20 billion export industry as universities and vocational education & training (VET) institutions enjoy double-digit year-on-year growth.  The attractiveness of Australia to international students, particularly those from neighbouring Asia-Pacific nations, is rightly a source of national pride. But how long can it last? In this article Horizon examines the challenges which lie ahead for education services and what marketers can do to protect their share of lucrative international student revenues.

 Disruption to education services is good old fashioned competition

US colleges are waking up to the revenue potential on offer from international students. Soon this will translate into aggressive marketing campaigns that will challenge Australia’s education institutions to more effectively market and position their services, notwithstanding ‘brand Australia’.

Department of Education & Training research highlights the risks of a waking US giant. Although globally the revenue pie attributed to international students is growing, the new push by US institutions positioning their offers to market will be formidable. Its colleges dominate all global rankings and can offer career pathways directly to numerous multinational corporations.

Whilst ‘brand Australia’ will remain an attractive plus-point, the reputation of our institutions is the major drawcard for international students. This can be undercut by US Ivy League universities which can rightfully point to stronger academic achievements and overall output.

The successful agency models which Australian universities and VET institutions have engaged could also be under threat by a newly enlightened US competitor.  Expect its universities to either threaten our existing agency relationships or create newer, larger models.

Death by a thousand cuts

Whilst US competition has the potential to inflict rapid pain to revenues in the Australian education services sector, the more serious slow, but systemic decline, could come from within our biggest student sourcing countries (i.e. China, India, Japan and South Korea) as they raise the quality and output of their own tertiary education and vocational training – including English tuition, to rival the current global elite.

China recently made its intentions clear. It wants to have world-leading universities and disciplines by 2030. This is not an unrealistic goal. In 1996 academic citations from US universities outranked those from China by 55-1. By 2014 this had shrunk to 2.5-1. From 1996-2014 overall academic output by USA universities grew by 60%. In China it grew by 1,600% (SOURCE:

Global university rankings are beginning to reflect the rising output and quality of Asian universities as names like NUS (Singapore), Peking University (China), KAIST (South Korea) and Tokyo University (Japan) become mainstays inside most global top 50 ranking lists.

Stories which will shape successful outcomes for Australian businesses

Universities by nature create content – lots of content. With the right strategy this content can be used as effective marketing collateral to lure prospective international students – stories and news which positions the Australian education experience and drives close engagement with tomorrow’s international students.

To counter direct in-market marketing by US and local institutions, Australian universities will need to mobilise and amplify advocacy networks in countries where our market share is about to be challenged. Our universities and VET institutes have strong alumni networks, built up over many over recent years, particularly throughout Asia-Pacific. Mobilising those voices for strategic marketing purposes will help protect the value proposition of education in Australia, notwithstanding as the international student experience in Australia.

Boots on the ground

Strategic marketing through existing channels may not be enough. Counsel and resources from local marketing and communications professionals may be necessary to exploit latent opportunities which are not known here, and tap into the consciousness of publics in our target markets from an insider perspective.

Content partnerships which help to positively elevate brand Australia internationally could very effectively drive positive influence among target audiences in the Asia-Pacific.

If you’d like to learn more about how communications can help amplify your university’s brand wither here or abroad, contact Horizon Communication Group. We have deep experience in the education sector as well as direct experience working throughout the Asia-Pacific.

First published in

The communications trends shaping opinions, cultural biases and purchasing decisions in Australia this year and beyond.


Cross-media ownership on the cards? 

2016 could be the year when long talked about changes to media ownership laws become a reality.  If it does there will be lasting repercussions for many Australian businesses. While a narrowing of editorial opinion in our media may well be a consequence of changes to cross-media ownership law, this is not what’s driving the move towards change.

From JP Morgan’s recent analysis of Australian media businesses the imperative for media businesses is existential. The likely mergers and acquisitions that may occur if cross-media ownership laws are relaxed might only provide short-term relief from the disruptive forces which are descending on media businesses.

Enlarged media companies protect their audience share through the delivery of popular content. Mergers and acquisitions mean consolidation of more owned content. The surge in popularity of NetFlix, Stan and co., notwithstanding the ever-increasing value of broadcasting rights for popular content like our major sporting codes, illustrate how its the content owners, not the publishers or distributors, which hold the balance of power.

Winners and losers

Traditional media businesses are intermediaries and ripe for disruption.  This is best evidenced by the media companies that are performing well by owning and/or producing content and building communities of engaged audiences – think or

These strong performers understand the power of owned media (i.e. website, mobile apps, microsites, etc.), attracting and engaging larger and larger online communities with little need for paid media advertising. Brands that are able to grow audience numbers to levels that compare with traditional media, stand to gain the most. They will have the opportunity to on-sell their owned media to businesses interested in reaching their audiences.

Take Qantas’ awol for example. It currently attracts over 55,000 visits per month with visitors staying an average 2 minutes on-site. Awol’s audience number outranks many traditional media verticals which charge thousands of dollars per advertising page (think local newspapers) tenfold, making the site attractive media space for businesses interested in reaching the Qantas-awol audience – e.g. tour operators, travel insurance, car rental, luggage brands, et al.

Huge opportunities for owned media as brands become publishers

Exploiting popular owned media will be attractive to marketers, CEOs and CFOs as it turns the traditional marketing cost centre into a revenue generator. This is the mother lode for marketing communications which is forever trying to justify ROI. Lenovo’s recent decision to take its global media buying in-house provides a strong case in point.

Intermediary businesses in media buying will be the first to feel the pain of disruption to the media industry. Media publishers and broadcasters that do not secure the content necessary to attract and retain audiences will follow.

The businesses which will thrive in this new disrupted era will be those that understand the new realities in media communications and take an investment view of the marketing communications function.

If you think these insights could be important to your organisation and you’d like to learn more, contact Horizon Communication Group.


First published at

Australia 2016: election campaign communications to go digital

Marketers and communications professionals should pay close attention during this year’s Federal Election.

dHorizon is looking at the communications trends which will shape our opinions, cultural trends and purchasing habits in 2016.  This week we begin with a look at the innovations that will drive communications from our political leaders.

  • Opportunities for marketers and communications professionals
  • 2016 Federal Election to embrace programmatic advertising and social media content testing
  • Increased data integration as field/ booth and voter files merge with social network data

A recent report concerning government communications spending portends positive times ahead for professionals involved in shaping and delivering public information campaigns (PICs). What remains to be seen is whether recent increased investment in planning and testing for PICs translates into more sophisticated campaigning at the upcoming Federal Election.

If it does, Australians should expect to start receiving more sophisticated political advertising this year as the government borrows techniques from consumer advertising as well as recent US Presidential Elections.

Programmatic to hit the hustings

Whatever your thoughts on the roll out of the NBN, few would argue Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull gets digital.  And, as Australia becomes the world leader in the purchase of programmatic advertising among all digital ad spending, expect this tactic to be used widely during the 2016 Federal Election.

If you happen to live in a marginal seat, get ready to receive targeted advertising on your mobile devices.

Data integration to inform advertising/ message creative

As an avowed advocate of better use of big data by the public service, expect the government to begin integrating traditional campaign data with data from social networks and content marketing.

If the government gets its data integration right, voters should expect to be targeted more than ever before with advertising that is informed by the individual’s content consumption. That is, the news and commentaries, advertisements and thought leadership we each read will shape the advertising messages we are fed by political candidates.

Applying online for home loan? Click to read about the ALP’s policy on first home buyer grants.

‘Liking’ a Facebook Group devoted to saving the Great Barrier Reef? Here’s a message from The Hon. Greg Hunt, Australian Minister for the Environment.

Marketing to become more fluid

The party which is prepared to apply fluid content creation informed by data will gain advantage at this year’s Federal Election and the messages which resonate most with voters will be those which are seen as the most authentic.

Trending messages and creative will be favoured over those that tank. Strategists will use content marketing data to integrate and inform other communications channels, including key messages delivered by candidates at door stops and planned media interviews.

If the political campaigns we see in the year ahead maximise the technological and strategic possibilities available there will be much for organisations and professional communicators to learn from – new ways to engage customers and stakeholders, more sophisticated measurement and tracking, and more ‘live’ message and creative development.

If you’d like to learn more contact HORIZON COMMUNICATION GROUP.

First published on 

Photography by Neil George. For more information visit

Digital Empire

Questions You Should be Asking the World Around You


Current & Breaking News | National & World Updates

Neil P George

Photographer & Director