Tag Archives: Australia

$20 bln Education Services Sector About to be Testsed

photodune-5908922-education-lAustralia’s education services sector is now a $20 billion export industry as universities and vocational education & training (VET) institutions enjoy double-digit year-on-year growth.  The attractiveness of Australia to international students, particularly those from neighbouring Asia-Pacific nations, is rightly a source of national pride. But how long can it last? In this article Horizon examines the challenges which lie ahead for education services and what marketers can do to protect their share of lucrative international student revenues.

 Disruption to education services is good old fashioned competition

US colleges are waking up to the revenue potential on offer from international students. Soon this will translate into aggressive marketing campaigns that will challenge Australia’s education institutions to more effectively market and position their services, notwithstanding ‘brand Australia’.

Department of Education & Training research highlights the risks of a waking US giant. Although globally the revenue pie attributed to international students is growing, the new push by US institutions positioning their offers to market will be formidable. Its colleges dominate all global rankings and can offer career pathways directly to numerous multinational corporations.

Whilst ‘brand Australia’ will remain an attractive plus-point, the reputation of our institutions is the major drawcard for international students. This can be undercut by US Ivy League universities which can rightfully point to stronger academic achievements and overall output.

The successful agency models which Australian universities and VET institutions have engaged could also be under threat by a newly enlightened US competitor.  Expect its universities to either threaten our existing agency relationships or create newer, larger models.

Death by a thousand cuts

Whilst US competition has the potential to inflict rapid pain to revenues in the Australian education services sector, the more serious slow, but systemic decline, could come from within our biggest student sourcing countries (i.e. China, India, Japan and South Korea) as they raise the quality and output of their own tertiary education and vocational training – including English tuition, to rival the current global elite.

China recently made its intentions clear. It wants to have world-leading universities and disciplines by 2030. This is not an unrealistic goal. In 1996 academic citations from US universities outranked those from China by 55-1. By 2014 this had shrunk to 2.5-1. From 1996-2014 overall academic output by USA universities grew by 60%. In China it grew by 1,600% (SOURCE: http://www.scimagojr.com/countryrank.php).

Global university rankings are beginning to reflect the rising output and quality of Asian universities as names like NUS (Singapore), Peking University (China), KAIST (South Korea) and Tokyo University (Japan) become mainstays inside most global top 50 ranking lists.

Stories which will shape successful outcomes for Australian businesses

Universities by nature create content – lots of content. With the right strategy this content can be used as effective marketing collateral to lure prospective international students – stories and news which positions the Australian education experience and drives close engagement with tomorrow’s international students.

To counter direct in-market marketing by US and local institutions, Australian universities will need to mobilise and amplify advocacy networks in countries where our market share is about to be challenged. Our universities and VET institutes have strong alumni networks, built up over many over recent years, particularly throughout Asia-Pacific. Mobilising those voices for strategic marketing purposes will help protect the value proposition of education in Australia, notwithstanding as the international student experience in Australia.

Boots on the ground

Strategic marketing through existing channels may not be enough. Counsel and resources from local marketing and communications professionals may be necessary to exploit latent opportunities which are not known here, and tap into the consciousness of publics in our target markets from an insider perspective.

Content partnerships which help to positively elevate brand Australia internationally could very effectively drive positive influence among target audiences in the Asia-Pacific.

If you’d like to learn more about how communications can help amplify your university’s brand wither here or abroad, contact Horizon Communication Group. We have deep experience in the education sector as well as direct experience working throughout the Asia-Pacific.

First published in http://www.horizoncg.com.au

BUSINESS & POLITICS: People over politics where infrastructure is concerned

nimby_p

A really interesting article today by Alan Kohler on the politicization of infrastructure projects in Australia and the broader region. In Australia, our inherited Westminster system of government, increasingly influenced by cashed up lobby groups, can hold the nation to ransom by putting needed infrastructure projects in stasis to protect minority interests.  The Westminster system is very easy to influence by lobbyists tapping the ‘not in my backyard’ reflex wherever major projects cover constituencies of strategic political interest, invariably consigning such projects to the too hard basket. Sadly, it’s not the projects that are too hard, it’s the politics.

One example which former prime minister John Howard liked was the national water grid, based on The Bradfield Scheme.  Bradfield’s idea was to build a massive network of irrigation channels and pipes to get excess water in the north to much drier lands in southern and central areas.  In addition to irrigating these areas with regular water supplies, the Bradfield system would double as a hydro-electric power generator to inland townships and communities.

The Bradfield scheme is a simple idea built on common sense logic.  The northern parts of the country experience annual, bankable monsoon rains while the southern and central areas experience regular, albeit less consistent, periods of drought.  Ask any resident of Toowoomba, Roma, Dalby, et al about water problems in their towns, then compare those stories to the recent experiences of residents in towns like Bundarra and Eurobadalla which received money under the Federal government’s ‘exceptional circumstances’ drought support fund until 2012.

In all, A$ 4.5 billion was provided to communities suffering through drought between 2001 and 2012.  A$ 4.5 billion would not come close to funding Bradfield’s idea to completion, but the idea is worthy of serious consideration.  Consider the environmental benefits for one.

Decades of clear-felling on the eastern Queensland coast has meant much more of the monsoon freshwater ends up in the Barrier Reef bleaching the coral and threatening marine habitats.  Consider too the cost savings to flood relief, clean up and insurance an end to regular flooding in Queensland would mean to the country’s finances.  Then consider the economic benefits of growing our regular, bankable arable lands in southern and central areas, a hugely important opportunity as we aim position the country as Asia’s breadbasket for the 21st century.

So how much would it cost to build Bradfield’s dream?  Hard to say exactly and few in favour of the idea have the political capital necessary to fund a serious costing. However, a potential benchmark exists in South Korea where a similar project was completed in 2011.

The Four Rivers project, designed to revitalise South Korea’s four major rivers – the Han, Guem, Nakdong and Yongsan, includes development projects on the rivers’ 14 tributaries and revitalisation of smaller-sized streams within broader environs.  The objectives of the project were to sure up fresh water resources, implement comprehensive flood control measures, improve water quality for wildlife and restore river ecosystems, create new multipurpose spaces for local residents, and encourage regional development centered around the river systems.  More than 929 km of streams and rivers were restored as part of the project, with a follow-up operation planned to restore more than 10,000 km of local streams.  More than 35 riparian wetlands have also been reconstructed as part of the plan.

With a price tag of around A$ 22 billion the Four Rivers project is expected to directly result in over 340,000 new jobs in South Korea.  In higher-cost Australia, where the distances required to deliver the Banfield scheme are considerably larger, a price tag of around A$ 80-100 billion is probably a realistic ball park.

Now, try to image a project like the Bradfield scheme happening in Australia.  Difficult isn’t it?  In the current political climate we seem incapable of putting the national interest ahead of the local, the state, the political, the tribal.  This is despite the fact that credit has never been cheaper and our debt to GDP is low by international standards.  In short, the window for nation-building projects has never more open than it is today.

In Alan Kohler’s article he points to China’s creation of the Asia Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) as an initiative designed partly to serve broader geopolitical goals by cutting out the US from major development projects in the region.  Say what you like about this goal, at least the Chinese are linking it to ‘development’, and with this one expects, regional prosperity.  This is an example of majority needs trumping those of minorities and if the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) gets to crow about the fruits of it’s idea at the UN or elsewhere, I for one will toast their success.

Like the Three Gorges damn project, the AIIB is a stark illustration of what political capital looks like.  It’s far more valuable than any paper currency and sadly, in western democracies like Australia, in very short supply.